|
| 《伤寒论》争议条文的多维审视与思考举隅 |
| Multidimensional Review and Reflection on Some Controversial Articles in the “Treatise on Febrile Diseases” |
| 投稿时间：2025-04-28 修订日期：2025-04-28 |
| 中文关键词: 《伤寒论》 争议条文 临证解读 以方测证 学科交叉 数智技术 |
| 英文关键词: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 29 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 《伤寒论》些许条文的研究存在一定争议,如少阴兼表证与“两感”的关系、“但见一证便是”“一证”的内涵、白虎汤证176条“表有热,里有寒”的误传、黄连汤条文“胸中有热,胃中有邪气”的解读及“三纲鼎立说”的争议,影响此书的理解运用及传承发展。为此本文简要分析产生条文理解争议的相关原因,并从临床实际出发,结合方药配伍以方测证,从全新角度对争议性条文进行解读,在此基础上提出融合互通各学派学术观点,甚至通过学科交叉及借鉴数智技术的思路来诠释条文内涵,以此为中医经典研究抛砖引玉。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| There is some controversy in the study of certain articles in "Treatise on Febrile Diseases", such as the relationship between Shaoyin and external symptoms and "two senses", the connotation of "but seeing one symptom is one symptom" and "one symptom", the misinterpretation of "heat on the surface and cold inside" in 176 articles of Baihu Decoction, the interpretation of "heat in the chest and evil energy in the stomach" in Huanglian Decoction, and the controversy over the "Three Cardinal Principles" theory, which restrict the understanding, application, inheritance and development of this book. Therefore, this article briefly analyzes the relevant reasons for the controversy over the interpretation of the articles, and based on clinical practice, combines the compatibility of prescriptions and medicines to test and prove, interprets the controversial articles from a new perspective. On this basis, it proposes the integration and communication of academic viewpoints from various schools, and even interprets the connotation of the articles through interdisciplinary and reference to digital intelligence technology, in order to stimulate the study of traditional Chinese medicine classics. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
